AFRIMINTEL · DFI Financeable Pipeline
Africa's financeable mining pipeline
The development- and construction-stage assets a DFI could actually finance — ordered by capital need, with DFI/ECA involvement, offtake, E&S status and the primary documents one click away. Critical-minerals assets (highest DFI additionality) are surfaced first; producing mines are retained only as comparables. African DFIs (AFC/Afreximbank) finance gold + potash; Western DFIs (DFC/IFC/EXIM) engage on critical minerals.
New — run your own numbers: the Project Economics Estimator takes your project inputs (or pre-fills from a platform asset) and returns a Derived NPV, IRR, government take and the government–investor revenue split. Deterministic, blind-pilot validated, statutory-regime aware. Also new: the beneficial-ownership framework map and the decision-room concept, and the cost-disclosure benchmark.
▸ Comparables — producing mines (not DFI-financeable)
Completeness: 13/13 pipeline assets fully adjudicated — every field Sourced, N/A, or Absent, zero un-researched Pending. State mix: 66 Sourced · 15 N/A · 10 Absent across the tracked fields. This is one slice held to a complete-and-checkable standard; each cell is traceable to a primary source or honestly blank. Reading the NPVs: study NPVs are NOT cross-asset comparable — each is at its own price deck (gold $1,568–3,000/oz, all below spot ~$4,200; Nyanzaga NPV10, others NPV5), commodity and vintage; within-asset use only. Additionality ≠ funding: "DFI capital need" is balance-sheet/funding status, not counterfactual additionality (sponsor-stated jobs flagged as such). 1 excluded: Manono (DRC) — active tenure arbitration.