DFI screening tools

The origination funnel — start to memo in one sitting
1 · Start here  →  2 · Screen the pipeline  →  3 · Build a shortlist  →  4 · Assemble the committee pack  →  5 · Export the pack (from the memo page)
Every figure Sourced, Derived, or Absent — never invented. New here? The 400-word orientation explains what that means for credit work.

One deal can touch forty desks. This is the path from screen to committee, on one verified record. The tools below run in the order an officer applies them — from "is this in our mandate?" to the committee pack an officer takes into the room. Every figure carries its three-state provenance; the screen narrows a universe for origination, it does not make the credit decision.

Why the workflow, not just the data
A single financing decision moves through many departments across geographies — country risk, E&S, credit, legal, technical — and each is commonly briefed from a different picture of the same asset. Final investment decisions on African mining commonly take a year or more from first screen, and time spent re-briefing desks from different pictures of the same asset is workflow, not analysis. The screen below compresses it: every desk reads the same verified record, every figure carries its provenance state, and the output is a committee pack, not a re-briefing cycle.

Scope: six headline development-finance institutions (EBRD, AfDB, AFC, Afreximbank, IFC, DFC). This is a curated set, not the full DFI universe — a complete per-institution eligibility matrix (others such as BII, FMO, Proparco, DBSA, and the complete country and exclusion lists) is a scheduled deepening.

Step 0 · the record

Shared dossier new

Every desk reading the same record is the point of all of the above. Record a figure once — with the document it came from, that document’s date, and who checked it — and your colleagues stop re-finding it. Scoped to your organisation; nobody outside it can read or write.

Step 1 · the gate

Mandate-fit screen start here

Pick an institution; see which roster assets sit within its geography, sector and thematic mandate — and which fall outside. EBRD's six-country footprint cuts 94 assets to 22; the African multilaterals are continent-wide.

Step 2 · the funnel

The four-layer screen

Mandate → bankability → downstream risk → financeability, as one monotonic funnel that narrows to a vintage-stamped shortlist (no tier, score or ranking). Exports the committee pack — what an officer takes into the room.

Step 3 · the read

Decision lens

The whole decision on one screen for a single asset — bankability, returns, downstream and safeguards together, with the committee questions each answers.

Step 3b · gate by gate

Seven gates, project by project 59 projects

All seven gates for each of 59 development-stage projects — what each shows — and the development banks whose published mandate covers the project’s country and sector. Financing status is shown as disclosed (an open financing gap, or financed and closing). No tier, score or verdict: the reading is yours. Mandate coverage is geography and sector only — not engagement, eligibility, ownership or sanctions screening.

Step 3c · is it still true

What's moving live freshness

A status-in-motion view over the same 59 assets — which have financing, FID or construction events in flight, whose ownership is in transition, and how fresh each cited filing is. Shows where the snapshot is moving under you and where a refresh is due, so the screen reads as a living dataset rather than a static cut.

Step 4 · the lender's lens

Debt-sizing & DSCR underwriting

Past equity returns into the credit question: how much debt the cash flows can carry, and whether it still covers in a price downturn. Sizes indicative debt capacity and stresses DSCR across down/spot/up — surfacing that the biggest-NPV asset can have the thinnest downside coverage.

Step 5 · the deliverable

Credit memo underwriting

A per-asset investment brief auto-composed from every layer — economics, sponsor, funding, time-to-cashflow, mandate fit, safeguards — in the eight-section committee format, with a three-state badge and source link on every line. Assembles the evidence with provenance; the call stays with the institution.

Hard gate

E&S safeguards screen eligibility

The gate a DFI screens before economics: per-asset ESIA status, the international standard it was benchmarked to (IFC PS / Equator), host-permit status, and the live Performance Standards — resettlement, biodiversity. Sourced where disclosed, named-Absent where not, against the IFC PS spine the institutions share.

Hard gate

Additionality & impact eligibility

The first gate — ahead of E&S and economics: per-asset jobs, government take, in-country value-addition, and the additionality test (would this happen without a DFI?), mapped to IFC AIMM / AfDB ADOA / DFC / EBRD. Revealed additionality where a DFI is already in; named-Absent where not.

Hard gate

Climate & Paris-alignment eligibility

Increasingly mandatory at IFC/EBRD/AfDB: the commodity's transition role on the demand side (IEA STEPS/APS/NZE), the project's own power source and emissions intensity, and physical-climate exposure. Transition-enabling vs neutral, with operational footprint where disclosed.

Hard gate

Integrity, sanctions & BO eligibility

The gate the E&S screen does not cover: sponsor and beneficial-ownership transparency, a desk-level sanctions/PEP indicator, and SOE-governance exposure. Points the institution's KYC screen — it does not run it; flags are neutral diligence-routing markers, not allegations.

Hard gate

Technical & IE-readiness eligibility

The gate before the Independent Engineer: study stage (scoping/PFS/DFS), currency, author, resource confidence and IE/lender-review status. Recent-DFS and in-construction assets are financing-ready; scoping-only, stalled-PFS and prior-owner-vintage studies are named as not.

Hard gate

Offtake & market-risk eligibility

Repayment-source diligence: gold (9 of 13) is liquid spot — a strength, not a gap; the specialty/strategic commodities (Colluli take-or-pay, Ewoyaa offtake, Kurmuk stream, Ngualla via Shenghe) carry the offtake-counterparty structure a DFI underwrites.

Record

Security record (ACLED) per asset

ACLED admin1 event counts where captured, and operators' own technical-report statements on security, each with its source. Afrimintel's political-risk grades were withdrawn on 12 October 2026; country indices are on each country record as their publishers state them.

Reference

Financeable pipeline

The diligence-grade financeability set — sponsor, capital need, funding status, offtake, deal structure — that forms the shortlist's deep layer.

Worked example

Kabanga screen

A single asset taken end-to-end through the screen, with primary-source citations, as a worked illustration of the method.

Methodology

How the screen is built

The mandate-fit and four-layer method in full: the geography modes, the criticality classification, the monotonic funnel, the ranking basis, and the stated limits.

Afrimintel DFI screening · provenance-stamped · a screening signal, not an underwriting recommendation · v2.137.281 · every change on the record